📚 Tale Teller Club Press (TTCP)

Introducing The Book of Immersion Teen Edition: A Sci-Fi Story for Curious Young Minds For the Teen Edition of The Book of Immersion , I’ve chosen a calm, mellow narration style. Many listeners—especially neurodivergent listeners—enjoy storytelling that is steady, predictable, and easy to follow. Rather than dramatic acting or sudden shifts in tone, the narration is designed to feel like a thoughtful guide leading you through the world of Immersion one layer at a time. The voice is warm, measured, and clear, allowing listeners to focus on the ideas, the atmosphere, and the unfolding mystery of Renyke’s journey. For many ND minds, calm storytelling can make science fiction feel less overwhelming and more immersive—exactly what this universe was designed to be.  The Book of Immersion: A Teen Edition of the Sci-Fi Universe Introducing Immersion for Young Explorers Welcome to the Immersion universe. If you’ve been following my work for a while, you’ll know that The Book of Immersion...

🎙️ Politica UK InfoPod Why Do Military Leaders Talk About War Like It’s a Video Game? By Sarnia de la Maré. Welcome to the Politica UK InfoPod. Today we explore something many listeners notice instinctively when they hear military briefings, political statements, or battlefield reports. The language often sounds strangely detached… almost like a video game. Targets are “neutralised.” Ships are “eliminated.” Positions are “taken out.” Yet behind those phrases are often cities, families, and civilians — including women and children. So why does the language of war often resemble the language of PlayStation strategy games, rather than the reality of human suffering? The Language of Distance Modern military language is deliberately designed to create distance. Instead of saying people were killed, officials say: “targets were neutralised” “enemy assets were destroyed” “collateral damage occurred.” These phrases are not accidental. They come from decades of military doctrine where precisio...

Politica UK InfoPod Who Owns the Seas? The Hidden Battles for the World’s Oceans by Sarnia de la Maré. Welcome to the Politica UK InfoPod. Today we ask a deceptively simple question. Who owns the seas — when no one owns the water? Across the world, countries are increasingly fighting over oceans, straits, seabeds, and canals. And yet, by international law, the oceans are supposed to belong to everyone. So why are the seas becoming one of the most contested spaces on Earth? The Ocean That Belongs to Everyone Modern maritime law — largely shaped by the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea — treats the open ocean as a global commons. In theory: no nation owns the deep ocean ships from any country can sail through it trade routes remain open to all. But nations do control the waters close to their shores. Every coastal country claims: 12 nautical miles of territorial waters, and an Exclusive Economic Zone extending about 200 nautical miles. Inside that zone, countries can contro...

Welcome to the Politica UK InfoPod. A growing question among analysts is no longer whether the Iran war will escalate. It is how long the conflict might last. Because if the war were to continue for six months, the consequences could reach far beyond the battlefield in the Middle East. The first and most immediate effect would likely be felt in global energy markets. Roughly one fifth of the world’s oil normally passes through the Strait of Hormuz, the narrow shipping channel connecting the Persian Gulf to the global ocean. Disruptions to that route have already shaken markets, and experts warn that prolonged instability could remove tens of millions of barrels of oil from global supply. ( Wikipedia ) If the conflict continues for months, analysts say oil prices could climb well above one hundred dollars a barrel and potentially reach around one hundred and thirty dollars in extreme scenarios. ( Chatham House ) Higher oil prices ripple through the global economy. Fuel costs rise, airli...

Welcome to the Politica UK InfoPod. As the war between the United States, Israel and Iran continues to unfold, another question is emerging beyond strategy and geopolitics. What has been the human cost so far? In the early days of any conflict, casualty figures are often incomplete and highly contested. Governments release partial numbers, independent verification can take time, and the situation on the ground changes quickly. Even so, several patterns are already beginning to appear. On the military side, both Iran and the coalition striking its facilities have suffered casualties, though the figures released publicly remain limited. Reports from American sources indicate that several United States service members have been killed during the campaign and that a larger number have been wounded in Iranian strikes on bases and allied infrastructure across the Gulf region. Iranian military casualties are believed to be significantly higher following extensive air strikes on missile facili...

    🇺🇸 USA News Rundown 🏛️ Politics & Government U.S. military operations tied to the escalating conflict with Iran continue, with reports of strikes and rising regional tensions affecting global energy security. Iran warned it may target U.S.‑linked economic and banking interests across the region in retaliation for the attacks. A special runoff election in Georgia’s 14th congressional district is drawing national attention as a test of political influence in a strongly Republican area. 💼 Business & Economy Global markets are stabilizing after early‑week volatility, with investors watching whether oil supply disruptions from the Middle East will intensify. Analysts warn higher oil prices could shift income toward energy companies and increase economic pressure on households. U.S. auto prices remain elevated, with the average new car nearing $47,000 , raising affordability concerns for many buyers. 💻 Technology Governments and companies world...

Excerpt from the book MENO ND Autism, Touch, and the Freedom of Menopause Introduction The Puzzle of Intimacy For most of my life I assumed there was something quietly wrong with me. I loved people. I felt loyalty, tenderness, and fierce protectiveness toward those close to me. I could sit for hours talking with someone I trusted, listening carefully, observing small details about their moods, remembering what mattered to them. Emotional closeness came naturally. Yet physical closeness often did not. Touch—particularly the casual, affectionate touch that many people seem to experience as comforting—frequently felt overwhelming. A hug could feel intrusive rather than soothing. Prolonged contact could become exhausting. Even small gestures that others interpreted as warmth could feel, internally, like sensory noise. This created a paradox that took many years to understand: it is possible to care deeply for others while simultaneously struggling with the physical language through which l...